1985 Opinion survey of MIS managers: Key issues
MIS Quarterly
An information systems keyword classification scheme
MIS Quarterly
Can the field of MIS be disciplined?
Communications of the ACM
An assessment of the contingency theory of management information systems
Journal of Management Information Systems
An analysis of research in information systems from the IS executive's perspective
Information and Management
Information and Management
Journal of Management Information Systems
Key issues in information systems management: an international perspective
Information and Management
Major IS concerns of entrepreneurial organizations
Information and Management
MIS research directions: a survey of researchers' views
ACM SIGMIS Database
A review of MIS research and disciplinary development
Journal of Management Information Systems
Viewpoint: choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies
Communications of the ACM
The journal communication system for MIS research
ACM SIGMIS Database
MIS research: a profile of leading journals and universities
ACM SIGMIS Database
MIS Quarterly
The challenge of modern academic knowledge exchange
ACM SIGITE Newsletter
Critical IS Issues in the Network Era
Information Resources Management Journal
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The results of a series of three surveys, published by the MIS Quarterly, have designated issues of primary concern to IS practitioners. In addition, Gillenson and Stutz have recently identified the major publication outlets for IS research. By mapping the topics addressed in these research publications with the primary issues of concern to the practitioner, this study responds to the question of how much IS researchers are addressing key practitioners concenrs. Findings suggest that IS researchers have been focusing on important practical issues but that these issues were critical to IS practitioners in the early 1980's. While some of these issues, such as end-user computing, data management, and software development may be of such abiding interest that it is appropriate to continue research in these areas, other topics have yet to receive the attention that they might deserve. The findings also specify practitioner issues that have experienced an increase or decrease in research interest and the publication outlets that emphasize primary practitioner issues.