Productivity reanalysis for unbalanced datasets with mixed-effects models

  • Authors:

  • Sousuke Amasaki

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Systems Engineering, Okayama Prefectural University, Okayama, Japan

  • Venue:
  • PROFES'10 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Data analysis is a major and important activity in software engineering research. For example, productivity analysis and evaluation of new technologies almost always conduct statistical analysis on collected data. Software data are usually unbalanced because they are collected from actual projects, not from formal experiments, and therefore their population is biased. Fixed-effects models have often been used for data analysis though they are for balanced datasets. This misuse causes analysis to be insufficient and conclusion to be wrong. The past study[1] proposed an iterative procedure to treat unbalanced datasets for productivity analysis. However, this procedure was sometimes failed to identify partially-confounded factors and its estimated effects were not easy to interpret. This study examined mixed-effects models for productivity analysis. Mixed-effects models can work the same for unbalanced datasets as for balanced datasets. Furthermore its application is straightforward and estimated effects are easy to interpret. Experiments with four datasets showed advantages of the mixed-effects models clearly.