Turing machines for dummies: why representations do matter

  • Authors:
  • Peter van Emde Boas

  • Affiliations:
  • ILLC, FNWI, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, GE

  • Venue:
  • SOFSEM'12 Proceedings of the 38th international conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Various methods exists in the litearture for denoting the configuration of a Turing Machine. A key difference is whether the head position is indicated by some integer (mathematical representation) or is specified by writing the machine state next to the scanned tape symbol (intrinsic representation). From a mathematical perspective this will make no difference. However, since Turing Machines are primarily used for proving undecidability and/or hardness results these representations do matter. Based on a number of applications we show that the intrinsic representation should be preferred.