A maximum-entropy-inspired parser
NAACL 2000 Proceedings of the 1st North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics conference
The Penn Treebank: annotating predicate argument structure
HLT '94 Proceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology
Intricacies of Collins' Parsing Model
Computational Linguistics
Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and MaxEnt discriminative reranking
ACL '05 Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
Reranking and self-training for parser adaptation
ACL-44 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Effective self-training for parsing
HLT-NAACL '06 Proceedings of the main conference on Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics
Self-training for biomedical parsing
HLT-Short '08 Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technologies: Short Papers
Automatic prediction of parser accuracy
EMNLP '08 Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Self-training PCFG grammars with latent annotations across languages
EMNLP '09 Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 2 - Volume 2
Automatic domain adaptation for parsing
HLT '10 Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
"cba to check the spelling" investigating parser performance on discussion forum posts
HLT '10 Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Uptraining for accurate deterministic question parsing
EMNLP '10 Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
We compare the use of edited text in the form of newswire and unedited text in the form of discussion forum posts as sources for training material in a self-training experiment involving the Brown reranking parser and a test set of sentences from an online sports discussion forum. We find that grammars induced from the two automatically parsed corpora achieve similar Parseval f-scores, with the grammars induced from the discussion forum material being slightly superior. An error analysis reveals that the two types of grammars do behave differently.