Progressive decision-based mean type filter for image noise suppression
Computer Standards & Interfaces
Conditional Dempster-Shafer Theory for Uncertain Knowledge Updating
IFSA '07 Proceedings of the 12th international Fuzzy Systems Association world congress on Foundations of Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing
A new evidence model and its application for discriminating enemy operation intention
CCDC'09 Proceedings of the 21st annual international conference on Chinese Control and Decision Conference
Switching-based filter based on Dempster's combination rule for image processing
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Decision-based fuzzy image restoration for noise reduction based on evidence theory
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Information Sciences: an International Journal
An automatic and self-adaptive multi-layer data fusion system for WiFi attack detection
International Journal of Internet Technology and Secured Transactions
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper describes a signal detection algorithm based on Dempster-Shafer theory. The detector combines evidence provided by multiple waveform features and explicitly considers uncertainty in the detection decision. The detector classifies waveforms as including a signal, not including a signal, or being uncertain, in which case no conclusion regarding presence or absence of a signal is drawn. The probability numbers required in the Dempster-Shafer formulation are defined as piecewise linear functions that can be described by two parameters, and the effects of these parameters on detector performance, using simulated data, are compared to Bayesian detection and to a fuzzy signal detector that also considers uncertainty. The performance of the Dempster-Shafer and fuzzy detectors shows similar dependence on the parameters, although, if parameters are adjusted so that the number of correctly classified waveforms are equal, the Dempster-Shafer detector has more uncertain classifications and fewer errors than the fuzzy detector, providing superior performance. The Dempster-Shafer detector incorporates a different type of uncertainty than the fuzzy detector, which may contribute to this difference in performance. The difference may also reflect the different mathematical operations used