Evidence-Based Software Engineering
Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering
Evidence-Based Software Engineering for Practitioners
IEEE Software
Teaching Evidence-Based Software Engineering to University Students
METRICS '05 Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium
A Survey of Controlled Experiments in Software Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
A Systematic Review of Software Development Cost Estimation Studies
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
A Systematic Review of Theory Use in Software Engineering Experiments
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Systematic review: A systematic review of effect size in software engineering experiments
Information and Software Technology
Evidence relating to Object-Oriented software design: A survey
ESEM '07 Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
The Role of Deliberate Artificial Design Elements in Software Engineering Experiments
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Presenting software engineering results using structured abstracts: a randomised experiment
Empirical Software Engineering
A mapping study on empirical evidence related to the models and forms used in the uml
Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement
Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review
Information and Software Technology
A systematic review of quasi-experiments in software engineering
Information and Software Technology
Review: A systematic review of software fault prediction studies
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
ESEM '09 Proceedings of the 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
The educational value of mapping studies of software engineering literature
Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1
Preliminary reporting guidelines for experience papers
EASE'09 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
Systematic mapping studies in software engineering
EASE'08 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
A review of studies on expert estimation of software development effort
Journal of Systems and Software
Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
Refining the systematic literature review process--two participant-observer case studies
Empirical Software Engineering
Testing in Service Oriented Architectures with dynamic binding: A mapping study
Information and Software Technology
Using mapping studies as the basis for further research - A participant-observer case study
Information and Software Technology
A taxonomy of service engineering stakeholder types
ServiceWave'11 Proceedings of the 4th European conference on Towards a service-based internet
Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Evidential assessment of software technologies
Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Test case prioritization: a systematic mapping study
Software Quality Control
Information and Software Technology
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We are strong advocates of evidence-based software engineering (EBSE) in general and systematic literature reviews (SLRs) in particular. We believe it is essential that the SLR methodology is being used constructively to support software engineering research. Aim: This study aims to assess the value of mapping studies which are a form of SLR that aims to identify and categorise the available research on a specific topic. Methods: We use a multi-case, participant observer case study using five examples of studies that were based on preceding mapping studies. Results: We identified 13 unique benefits that can accrue from basing research on a preceding mapping study of which only 2 were case specific. We also identified 9 problems associated with using preceding mapping studies of which two were case specific. Conclusions: Mapping studies can save time and effort for researchers and provide baselines to assist new research efforts. However, they must be of high quality in terms of completeness and rigour if they are to be a reliable basis for follow-on research.