Improving the representation of legal case texts with information extraction methods
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Semantics-based legal citation network
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Extractive summarisation of legal texts
Artificial Intelligence and Law - AI & law in eGovernment and eDemocracy part I
Blind men and elephants: What do citation summaries tell us about a research article?
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Machine Translation of Legal Information and Its Evaluation
Canadian AI '09 Proceedings of the 22nd Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Using citations to generate surveys of scientific paradigms
NAACL '09 Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Quantifying the limits and success of extractive summarization systems across domains
HLT '10 Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Combining different summarization techniques for legal text
HYBRID '12 Proceedings of the Workshop on Innovative Hybrid Approaches to the Processing of Textual Data
Knowledge acquisition for categorization of legal case reports
PKAW'12 Proceedings of the 12th Pacific Rim conference on Knowledge Management and Acquisition for Intelligent Systems
Citation based summarisation of legal texts
PRICAI'12 Proceedings of the 12th Pacific Rim international conference on Trends in Artificial Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents the challenges and possibilities of a novel summarisation task: automatic generation of catchphrases for legal documents. Catchphrases are meant to present the important legal points of a document with respect of identifying precedents. Automatically generating catchphrases for legal case reports could greatly assist in searching for legal precedents, as many legal texts do not have catchphrases attached. We developed a corpus of legal (human-generated) catchphrases (provided with the submission), which lets us compute statistics useful for automatic catchphrase extraction. We propose a set of methods to generate legal catchphrases and evaluate them on our corpus. The evaluation shows a recall comparable to humans while still showing a competitive level of precision, which is very encouraging. Finally, we introduce a novel evaluation method for catchphrases for legal texts based on the known Rouge measure for evaluating summaries of general texts.