Improving the representation of legal case texts with information extraction methods

  • Authors:

  • Stefanie Brüninghaus;Kevin D. Ashley

  • Affiliations:

  • Learning Research and Development Center, Intelligent Systems Program and School of Law, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA;Learning Research and Development Center, Intelligent Systems Program and School of Law, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
  • Year:
  • 2001

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The prohibitive cost of assigning indices to textual cases is a major obstacle for the practical use of AI and Law systems supporting reasoning and arguing with cases. While progress has been made toward extracting certain facts from well-structured case texts or classifying case abstracts under Key Number concepts, these methods still do not suffice for the complexity of indexing concepts in CBR systems.In this paper, we lay out how a better example representation may facilitate classification-based indexing. Our hypotheses are that (1) abstracting from the individual actors and events in cases, (2) capturing actions in multi-word features, and (3) recognizing negation, can lead to a better representation of legal case texts for automatic indexing. We discuss how to implement these techniques with state-of-the-art NLP tools. Preliminary experimental results suggest that a combination of domain-specific knowledge and information extraction techniques can be used to generalize from the examples and derive more powerful features.