Readings in natural language processing
Ashley,K. D.-But, see, accord: generating blue book citations in HYPO
ICAIL '87 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A language for legal Discourse I. basic features
ICAIL '89 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Domain-specific knowledge acquisition for conceptual sentence analysis
Domain-specific knowledge acquisition for conceptual sentence analysis
Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Information and knowledge management
Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Introduction To Automata Theory, Languages, And Computation
Introduction To Automata Theory, Languages, And Computation
Focusing for interpretation of pronouns
Computational Linguistics
The generic information extraction system
MUC5 '93 Proceedings of the 5th conference on Message understanding
Language Systems Inc.: description of the DBG system as used for MUC-5
MUC5 '93 Proceedings of the 5th conference on Message understanding
Improving the representation of legal case texts with information extraction methods
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A machine learning approach to prior case retrieval
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Automatic recognition of distinguishing negative indirect history language in judicial opinions
Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management
Information extraction from case law and retrieval of prior cases
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on AI and law
Deep semantic interpretations of legal texts
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper describes an information extraction system that identifies and analyzes statements in court opinions regarding the value of cited cases as precedents. The system employs partial parsing techniques in conjunction with a semantic grammar to identify the language associated with such rulings. The most novel aspect of the system lies in its anaphora resolution module that combines syntactic, semantic, and domain-specific inference rules with local discourse information to link such language to case references.