Algorithms for energy-efficient multicasting in static ad hoc wireless networks
Mobile Networks and Applications
Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks
HICSS '00 Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-Volume 8 - Volume 8
Energy-Aware Routing in Cluster-Based Sensor Networks
MASCOTS '02 Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunications Systems
HEED: A Hybrid, Energy-Efficient, Distributed Clustering Approach for Ad Hoc Sensor Networks
IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
A power control MAC protocol for ad hoc networks
Wireless Networks
Wireless sensor network localization techniques
Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking
Collaborative broadcasting and compression in cluster-based wireless sensor networks
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN)
Wireless sensor network survey
Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking
Transmit Power Control in Wireless Mesh Networks Considered Harmful
MESH '09 Proceedings of the 2009 Second International Conference on Advances in Mesh Networks
Virtual calibration for RSSI-based indoor localization with IEEE 802.15.4
ICC'09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international conference on Communications
Adaptive clustering for mobile wireless networks
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents two new routing protocols for mobile sensor networks, viz. power-controlled routing (PCR) and its enhanced version, i.e. Enhanced Power-Controlled Routing (EPCR). In both the protocols, fixed transmission power is employed in the clustering phase but when ordinary nodes are about to send their data to their respective cluster-heads, they change their transmission power according to their distance from their cluster-head. While in PCR, the nodes are associated with the cluster-head on the basis of weight, in EPCR it is done on the basis of distance. In addition to the protocols, we are suggesting a packet loss recovery mechanism for the PCR and EPCR. Both protocols work well for both mobile and static networks and are designed to achieve high network lifetime, high packet delivery ratio, and high network throughput. These protocols are extensively simulated using mass mobility model, with different speeds and different number of nodes to evaluate their performance. Simulation results show that both PCR and EPCR are successful in achieving their objectives by using variable transmission powers and smart clustering. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.