A note on optimal metering schemes
Information Processing Letters
Bounds for Robust Metering Schemes and Their Relationship with A-code
ASIACRYPT '02 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security: Advances in Cryptology
A Linear Algebraic Approach to Metering Schemes
Designs, Codes and Cryptography
International Journal of Information and Computer Security
On the security of metering scheme
Computers & Mathematics with Applications
A hybrid method to detect deflation fraud in cost-per-action online advertising
ACNS'10 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Applied cryptography and network security
| Hi-index | 754.84 |
In order to decide on advertisement fees for Web servers, Naor and Pinkas (see Proc. Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYPT'98 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). New York: Springer-Verlag, vol.1403, p.576-590, 1998) introduced metering schemes. They proposed metering schemes in which any server is able to compute a proof to be sent to an audit agency if and only if it has been visited by at least a certain number, say h, of clients. In such schemes, any server which has been visited by less than h clients has no information about the proof; consequently, it does not receive any money from the audit agency. In order to have a more flexible payment system, Blundo, De Bonis, and Masucci (see Proc. 4th Int. Symp. Distributed Computing-2000 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). New York: Springer-Verlag, vol.1914, p.194-208,2000) introduced metering schemes with pricing. These schemes allow different rates of payments based on the number of visits that each server has received. In this paper, we are interested in the efficiency of metering schemes with pricing. We propose a new model for metering schemes with pricing and we provide lower bounds on the size of the information distributed to clients and servers, and on the number of random bits needed by the audit agency to set up a metering scheme with pricing. These bounds are tight, as we provide a scheme which achieves them with equality. Compared to the scheme presented by Blundo, De Bonis, and Masucci, our scheme distributes less information to clients and servers. The drawback of our scheme is that it requires servers to interact with the audit agency in order to compute their proofs