What ever happened to structured analysis?
Datamation
CASE is software automation
CASE Tools and the IS workplace: Some findings form empirical research
SIGCPR '88 Proceedings of the ACM SIGCPR conference on Management of information systems personnel
Experiences with the use of CASE-tools in The Netherlands
CAiSE '90 Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Advanced information systems engineering
CAiSE '90 Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Advanced information systems engineering
Comparing software development methods: example
Information and Software Technology
Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems
Software engineering tools for system development
Computer-Aided Engineering Journal
Elements of a realistic CASE tool adoption budget
Communications of the ACM
A manager's guide to software engineering
A manager's guide to software engineering
Software development productivity and back-end CASE tools
Information and Software Technology - Special issue on CASE (computer-aided software engineering)
Structured analysis and design for the CASE user
Structured analysis and design for the CASE user
Inside ADW and IEF: the promise and reality of CASE
Inside ADW and IEF: the promise and reality of CASE
CASE: Reliability Engineering for Information Systems
IEEE Software
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Computer-aided software engineering (CASE) technology has been adopted by the Western information systems community for a decade. However, CASE is new in Malaysia, and little is known about its use and effects on the software development tasks within the Malaysian context. This paper evaluates CASE technology in terms of its impacy on productivity, software quality and maintanance, and makes reference to a survey that was carried out into the use of CASE tools in 40 Malaysian organisations. Survey results reported an uneven improvement in productivity that varied across the stages of the life cycle. Productivity was also found to vary depending on the types of CASE softwate. Additional results revealed that upper CASE tools contributed more towards the improvement of software quality, while lower CASE tools were rated higher for maintenance reduction. However, CASE technology was not successful in all organisations. People issues related to CASE implementation caused CASE failures in some of the surveyed organisations. The findings of the survey were further compared with the European, Australian and US studies, and interesting differences were highlighted.