QoS support between ad hoc networks and fixed IP networks
Computer Communications
ICCSA '08 Proceeding sof the international conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, Part I
A robust reservation protocol for wireless ad-hoc networks
Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing: Connecting the World Wirelessly
A collision-free MAC scheme for multimedia wireless mesh backbone
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
Resource reservation for voice support in MANETs
WiCOM'09 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Wireless communications, networking and mobile computing
Providing QoS in ad hoc networks with distributed resource reservation
ITC20'07 Proceedings of the 20th international teletraffic conference on Managing traffic performance in converged networks
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
Convergence and performance analysis of leaderless synchronization in Wi-Fi networks
Proceedings of the 6th ACM workshop on Performance monitoring and measurement of heterogeneous wireless and wired networks
International Journal of Communication Systems
Estimation of expectable network quality in wireless mesh networks
IFIP'12 Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on Networking
Hi-index | 0.07 |
This paper presents an end-to-end reservation protocol for quality-of-service (QoS) support in the medium access control layer of wireless multihop mesh networks. It reserves periodically repeating time slots for QoS-demanding applications, while retaining the distributed coordination function (DCF) for best effort applications. The key features of the new protocol, called "distributed end-to-end allocation of time slots for real-time traffic (DARE), are distributed setup, interference protection, and scheduling of real-time data packets, as well as the repair of broken reservations and the release of unused reservations. A simulation-based performance study compares the delay and throughput of DARE with those of DCF and the priority-based enhanced distributed channel access (EDCA) used in IEEE 802.11e. In contrast to DCF and EDCA, DARE has a low, nonvarying delay and a constant throughput for each reserved flow