Adding temporary memory to ZCS
Adaptive Behavior
Toward Optimal Classifier System Performance in Non-Markov Environments
Evolutionary Computation
Classifier fitness based on accuracy
Evolutionary Computation
An analysis of matching in learning classifier systems
Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Revisiting UCS: Description, Fitness Sharing, and Comparison with XCS
Learning Classifier Systems
Learning classifier systems: a complete introduction, review, and roadmap
Journal of Artificial Evolution and Applications
Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
PPSN'10 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Parallel problem solving from nature: Part I
PPSN'12 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - Volume Part I
A simple multi-core parallelization strategy for learning classifier system evaluation
Proceedings of the 15th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The application of learning classifier systems (LCSs) to classification and data mining in genetic association studies has been the target of previous work. Recent efforts have focused on: (1) correctly discriminating between predictive and non-predictive attributes, and (2) detecting and characterizing epistasis (attribute interaction) and heterogeneity. While the solutions evolved by Michigan-style LCSs (M-LCSs) are conceptually well suited to address these phenomena, the explicit characterization of heterogeneity remains a particular challenge. In this study we introduce attribute tracking, a mechanism akin to memory, for supervised learning in M-LCSs. Given a finite training set, a vector of accuracy scores is maintained for each instance in the data. Post-training, we apply these scores to characterize patterns of association in the dataset. Additionally we introduce attribute feedback to the mutation and crossover mechanisms, probabilistically directing rule generalization based on an instance's tracking scores. We find that attribute tracking combined with clustering and visualization facilitates the characterization of epistasis and heterogeneity while uniquely linking individual instances in the dataset to etiologically heterogeneous subgroups. Moreover, these analyses demonstrate that attribute feedback significantly improves test accuracy, efficient generalization, run time, and the power to discriminate between predictive and non-predictive attributes in the presence of heterogeneity.