An investigation of Vladimir Propp's 31 functions and 8 broad character types and how they apply to the analysis of video games

Authors:
Andrew Brusentsev;Michael Hitchens;Deborah Richards
Affiliations:
Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia;Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia;Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
Venue:
Proceedings of The 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the System
Year:
2012

Citing 3
Cited 0

Is the wolf angry or... just hungry?

Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents
Motif definition and classification to structure non-linear plots and to control the narrative flow in interactive dramas

ICVS'05 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Virtual Storytelling: using virtual reality technologies for storytelling
INSCAPE: storymodels for interactive storytelling and edutainment applications

ICVS'05 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Virtual Storytelling: using virtual reality technologies for storytelling

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper is concerned with answering the following question: "Is Vladimir Propp's Model (31 Functions and 8 Broad Character Types) a valid model with which to analyse games from a variety of gaming genres?" More specifically what genres of games can be analysed by this model and in what terms? Can the model only be used to analyse the story arcs of games or can it also be used for analysis of level narrative and even perhaps for dialogue between the player character and computer controlled characters? In this paper, Propp's Model will be used to analyse selected games from a variety of genres in terms of character archetypes, story arc, level narrative and character dialogue. The ability of the model to cope with in-game player decisions will also be examined. The validity of the model as a video game analysis tool is assessed and recommendations given on which video game genres the model is most applicable.