Understanding and improving app installation security mechanisms through empirical analysis of android

  • Authors:
  • David Barrera;Jeremy Clark;Daniel McCarney;Paul C. van Oorschot

  • Affiliations:
  • Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada;Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the second ACM workshop on Security and privacy in smartphones and mobile devices
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We provide a detailed analysis of two largely unexplored aspects of the security decisions made by the Android operating system during the app installation process: update integrity and UID assignment. To inform our analysis, we collect a dataset of Android application metadata and extract features from these binaries to gain a better understanding of how developers interact with the security mechanisms invoked during installation. Using the dataset, we find empirical evidence that Android's current signing architecture does not encourage best security practices. We also find that limitations of Android's UID sharing method force developers to write custom code rather than rely on OS-level mechanisms for secure data transfer between apps. As a result of our analysis, we recommend incrementally deployable improvements, including a novel UID sharing mechanism with applicability to signature-level permissions. We additionally discuss mitigation options for a security bug in Google's Play store, which allows apps to transparently obtain more privileges than those requested in the manifest.