COLLAGEN: A Collaboration Manager for Software Interface Agents
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Modeling Dialogues Using Argumentation
ICMAS '00 Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS-2000)
Towards a formal framework for the search of a consensus between autonomous agents
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Effects of adaptive robot dialogue on information exchange and social relations
Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction
Human-robot interaction: a survey
Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction
Olympus: an open-source framework for conversational spoken language interface research
NAACL-HLT-Dialog '07 Proceedings of the Workshop on Bridging the Gap: Academic and Industrial Research in Dialog Technologies
Exploring miscommunication and collaborative behaviour in human-robot interaction
SIGDIAL '09 Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference: The 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue
Defeasible argumentation support for an extended BDI architecture
ArgMAS'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems
Designing the HRTeam framework: lessons learned from a rough-and-ready human/multi-robot team
AAMAS'11 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Advanced Agent Technology
Using argumentation to reason about trust and belief1
Journal of Logic and Computation
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The research on human-robot dialogue to support fluent human robot interaction is still in its early stages. Current issues in the human-robot dialogue domain could be divided into two major categories, which are described in this proposal as the "what to say" problem and the "how to say it" problem. The "what to say" problem addresses ways to determine the content of plausible dialogue during human robot interaction, whereas the "how to say it" problem addresses the best ways for a robot to deliver that content (e.g., using text, gestures, speech or different modalities). Dialogue within the robotics domain also needs to address the "when to say it" problem that considers the timing of dialogue delivery (e.g., turn taking). Human-robot collaboration may fail for many reasons. This research focuses on conflicts and robot errors during human-robot collaboration. Conflicting beliefs occur when participating collaborators have two different views of the physical world due to inaccessible or non-static information. Intuitively, collaborators need to persuade each other to agree on the same beliefs about the state of the world in order to complete collaborative tasks successfully. Robot errors may happen due to miscommunication or simply lack of communication. Moreover, lack of dialogue support for a human to query a robot makes it even more difficult for error recovery. This may lead to failure of a collaborative plan or shared goal. Dialogue is the natural way to resolve errors due to miscommunication. This research explores the notion of an argumentation-based dialogue method for human-robot interaction (HRI). The proposed research aims to design and implement a logic-based dialogue framework grounded on argumentation theory to address the "what to say" problem of human robot communication during a collaborative task.