The elements of computer credibility
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Believe it or not: factors influencing credibility on the Web
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Prominence-interpretation theory: explaining how people assess credibility online
CHI '03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
News cues: Information scent and cognitive heuristics: Research Articles
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Why you can't cite Wikipedia in my class
Communications of the ACM - ACM's plan to go online first
A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping
International Journal of Electronic Commerce
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Trust in wikipedia: how users trust information from an unknown source
Proceedings of the 4th workshop on Information credibility
Wikipedia and the two-faced professoriate
Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration
Factual accuracy and trust in information: The role of expertise
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Credibility evaluation has become a daily task in the current world of online information that varies in quality. The way this task is performed has been a topic of research for some time now. In this study, we aim to extend this research by proposing an integrated layer model of trust. According to this model, trust in information is influenced by trust in its source. Moreover, source trust is influenced by trust in the medium, which in turn is influenced by a more general propensity to trust. We provide an initial validation of the proposed model by means of an online quasi-experiment (n = 152) in which participants rated the credibility of Wikipedia articles. Additionally, the results suggest that the participants were more likely to have too little trust in Wikipedia than too much trust.