Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Argumentation-based negotiation
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Elements of Argumentation
Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation Using Temporal Knowledge
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence
Using Defeasible Logic Programming for Argumentation-Based Decision Support in Private Law
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
On Admissibility in Timed Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ECAI 2010: 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence
An empirical study of interest-based negotiation
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Multi-criteria argument selection in persuasion dialogues
The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3
Argumentation frameworks as constraint satisfaction problems
SUM'11 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management
t-DeLP: a temporal extension of the defeasible logic programming argumentative framework
SUM'11 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Scalable uncertainty management
Relating the semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks and standard AFs
IJCAI'11 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Two
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In the last decade, several argument-based formalisms have emerged, with application in many areas, such as legal reasoning, autonomous agents and multi-agent systems; many are based on Dung's seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AF). Recent research in the area has led to Temporal Argumentation Frameworks (TAF), that extend AF by considering the temporal availability of arguments. A new framework was introduced in subsequent research, called Extended Temporal Argumentation Framework (E-TAF), extending TAF with the capability of modeling the availability of attacks among arguments. E-TAF is powerful enough to model different time-dependent properties associated with arguments; moreover, we will present an instantiation of the abstract framework E-TAF on an extension of Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) incorporating the representation of temporal availability and strength factors of arguments varying over time, associating these characteristics with the language of DeLP. The strength factors are used to model different more concrete measures such as reliability, priorities, etc.; the information is propagated to the level of arguments, then the E-TAF definitions are applied establishing their temporal acceptability.