The cost structure of sensemaking
CHI '93 Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
The designers' outpost: a tangible interface for collaborative web site
Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
IEEE Software
Agile Project Management With Scrum
Agile Project Management With Scrum
Research Directions in Requirements Engineering
FOSE '07 2007 Future of Software Engineering
SEURAT: integrated rationale management
Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering
Rationale-Based Software Engineering
Rationale-Based Software Engineering
A meta-model for usable secure requirements engineering
Proceedings of the 2010 ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering for Secure Systems
A survey of traceability in requirements engineering and model-driven development
Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)
Making Sense of Product Requirements
RE '10 Proceedings of the 2010 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference
HCSE'10 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Human-centred software engineering
Persona cases: a technique for grounding personas
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Effects of a tabletop interface on the co-construction of concept maps
INTERACT'11 Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction - Volume Part III
Proceedings of the 21st international conference companion on World Wide Web
Towards Tool-Support for Usable Secure Requirements Engineering with CAIRIS
International Journal of Secure Software Engineering
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Requirements play an important role in software engineering, but their perceived usefulness means that they often fail to be properly maintained. Traceability is often considered a means for motivating and maintaining requirements, but this is difficult without a better understanding of the requirements themselves. Sensemaking techniques help us get this understanding, but the representations necessary to support it are difficult to create, and scale poorly when dealing with medium to large scale problems. This paper describes how, with the aid of supporting software tools, concept mapping can be used to both make sense of and improve the quality of a requirements specification. We illustrate this approach by using it to update the requirements specification for the EU webinos project, and discuss several findings arising from our results.