Evaluating a user interface with ergonomic criteria
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
ConcurTaskTrees: A Diagrammatic Notation for Specifying Task Models
INTERACT '97 Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 Interantional Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Using guidelines to assist in the visualisation design process
APVis '05 proceedings of the 2005 Asia-Pacific symposium on Information visualisation - Volume 45
Web Accessibility: Web Standards and Regulatory Compliance
Web Accessibility: Web Standards and Regulatory Compliance
Automata Theory with Modern Applications
Automata Theory with Modern Applications
Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse User Populations
Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse User Populations
Flexible tool support for accessibility evaluation
Interacting with Computers
Handbook of Usability TestingXXX: Howto Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests
Handbook of Usability TestingXXX: Howto Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests
HCII'11 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction: design and development approaches - Volume Part I
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
For more than two decades, the HCI community has elaborated numerous tools for user interface evaluation. Although the related tools are wide, the evaluation remains a difficult task. This paper presents a new approach for user interface evaluation. The proposed evaluation process focuses on utility and usability as software quality factors. It is based on the UI ergonomic quality inspection as well as the analysis and the study of the Human-Computer interaction. The proposed approach is mainly based on graphic controls dedicated to the user interface evaluation. These controls have, on the one hand, the role to compose graphically the interfaces. On the other hand, they contribute to the UI evaluation through integrated mechanisms. The evaluation is structured into two phases. The first consists of a local self-evaluation of the graphical controls according to a set of ergonomic guidelines. This set is specified by the evaluator. The second allows an electronic informer to estimate the interaction between the user interface (graphically composed by the evaluation based controls) and the user.