Set-membership approach for identification of parameter and prediction uncertainty in power-law relationships: The case of sediment yield

  • Authors:
  • Karel J. Keesman;John P. Norton;Barry F. W. Croke;Lachlan T. H. Newham;Anthony J. Jakeman

  • Affiliations:
  • Systems and Control Group, Wageningen University, Bornse Weilanden 9, 6708 WG Wageningen, The Netherlands and Fenner School of Environment and Society, National Centre for Groundwater Research and ...;Fenner School of Environment and Society, National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia and School of Electronic, Electri ...;Fenner School of Environment and Society, National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia;Fenner School of Environment and Society, National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia;Fenner School of Environment and Society, National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia

  • Venue:
  • Environmental Modelling & Software
  • Year:
  • 2013

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Power laws are used to describe a large variety of natural and industrial phenomena. Consequently, they are used in a wide range of scientific research and management applications. This paper focuses on the identification of bounds on the parameter and prediction uncertainty in a power-law relation from experimental data, assuming known bounds on the error between model output and observations. The prediction uncertainty bounds can subsequently be used as constraints, for example in optimisation and scenario studies. The set-membership approach involves identification and removal of outliers, estimation of the feasible parameter set, evaluation of the feasible model-output set and tuning of the specified bounds on model-output error. As an example the procedure is applied to data of scattered sediment yield versus catchment area (Wasson, 1994). The key result is an un-falsified relationship between sediment yield and catchment area with uncertainty bounds on its parameters. The set-membership results are compared with the results from a conventional least-squares approach with first-order variance propagation, assuming a zero-mean, symmetrical error distribution.