Introduction to unmanned spacecraft on-board communications: evolution of timeliness needs

  • Authors:
  • David Jameux;Christian Fraboul

  • Affiliations:
  • ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands;Université de Toulouse, France

  • Venue:
  • Proceeings of the 2nd International Workshop on Worst-Case Traversal Time
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The aim of this presentation is to provide an introduction to the communication needs on board unmanned spacecraft and to their current evolution. By nature, spacecraft are beyond any improvement or repair capability by means of physical/mechanical intervention as soon as they are launched into space. This leads to requirements for on-board communication being dominated by reliability. However, the level of autonomy required from any modern spacecraft in nominal operation mode leads to timeliness requirements as well. The combination of both properties, Reliability and Timeliness, is a common frame for communications on board unmanned spacecraft and is abbreviated in the acronym "RT" which, in this context, does not mean "real-time". Although both reliability and timeliness are the main requirements on communications on board unmanned spacecraft, this presentation done in the context of the RTS WCTT (Worst Case Traversal Time) workshop focuses mainly on the timeliness issues. We first describe the need for non-real-time and real-time communications on-board any unmanned spacecraft and then the scope of real-time communications on-board past and current spacecraft. Current and future trends are also presented for which no solution is clearly established yet. This presentation briefly describes the challenges to be addressed with respect to these trends. It then exposes short-terms solutions that have been academically investigated and are now available to spacecraft designers. Finally, the presentation provides perspectives on possible investigation lines. Overall, this presentation shows that, for the schedulability of SpaceWire traffic, both in the frame of the real-time communications only and in the more complex frame of mixed hard real-time, soft real-time and non-real-time traffic, any academic result is very welcome. In this domain, most space agencies are willing to support related academic research. There are many other parameters (mostly related to reliability) to be taken into account for the design of real-time communication protocols for spacecraft data handling, like Failure Detection, Isolation and Recovery (FDIR) issues, redundancy (cold, warm, hot, cross-strapping), Single Point of Failure (SPF), Single Fault hypothesis, availability, maintainability, determinism, babbling idiot, fails-safe, fail-operational, bus guardian, safety, security, etc. These concepts are not presented in this paper. They should be taken on board any academic research on communications on board unmanned spacecraft, and would require a dedicated paper at the same level as this presentation introduces timeliness issues.