Economics of modeling and simulation: reflections and implications for healthcare

Authors:
Mohsen Jahangirian;Simon J. E. Taylor;Terry Young
Affiliations:
Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK;Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK;Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
Venue:
Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference
Year:
2010

Citing 9
Cited 2

Barriers to implementing simulation in health care

WSC '94 Proceedings of the 26th conference on Winter simulation
Verification and validation and complex environments: a study in service sector

Proceedings of the 30th conference on Winter simulation
An Integrated Labor-Management System for Taco Bell

Interfaces
Extended-Enterprise Supply-Chain Management at IBM Personal Systems Group and Other Divisions

Interfaces
The economics of simulation

WSC '76 Proceedings of the 76 Bicentennial conference on Winter simulation
Accelerating the Profitability of Hewlett-Packard's Supply Chains

Interfaces
Determining the ROI for simulation, panel: increasing return on investment from simulation (panel)

Proceedings of the 35th conference on Winter simulation: driving innovation
Procurement Risk Management (PRM) at Hewlett-Packard Company

Interfaces
Reducing Flight Delays Through Better Traffic Management

Interfaces

A survey on the use of simulation in German healthcare

Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference
Simulation-based study of hematology outpatient clinics with focus on model reusability

Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Arguably, it is widely known that there is much activity in modeling & simulation (M&S) in healthcare, particularly in decision support and analysis for care delivery systems (CDS). This is supported by recent literature surveys. However, there is limited evidence of reported cost, success and impact. To attempt to investigate the so-called 'economics' of M&S in this area, this paper aims to depict a general picture of the economics of M&S supported by available evidence and to develop an initial set of guidelines using a novel framework that may assist decision makers in assessing the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of M&S. Our paper concludes with an urgent call for research in this area, specifically in terms of using standardized qualitative and quantitative methods to gather evidence for analysis and dissemination materials that 'speak' to government-level policy makers.