Navigating between chaos and bureaucracy: backgrounding trust in open-content communities

Authors:
Paul B. de Laat
Affiliations:
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Venue:
SocInfo'12 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Social Informatics
Year:
2012

Citing 5
Cited 0

Lifting the veil: improving accountability and social transparency in Wikipedia with wikidashboard

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Assigning trust to Wikipedia content

WikiSym '08 Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Wikis
How can contributors to open-source communities be trusted? On the assumption, inference, and substitution of trust

Ethics and Information Technology
The entanglement of trust and knowledge on the Web

Ethics and Information Technology
Coercion or empowerment? Moderation of content in Wikipedia as `essentially contested' bureaucratic rules

Ethics and Information Technology

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Many virtual communities that rely on user-generated content (such as social news sites, citizen journals, and encyclopedias in particular) offer unrestricted and immediate 'write access' to every contributor. It is argued that these communities do not just assume that the trust granted by that policy is well-placed; they have developed extensive mechanisms that underpin the trust involved ('backgrounding'). These target contributors (stipulating legal terms of use and developing etiquette, both underscored by sanctions) as well as the contents contributed by them (patrolling for illegal and/or vandalist content, variously performed by humans and bots; voting schemes). Backgrounding trust is argued to be important since it facilitates the avoidance of bureaucratic measures that may easily cause unrest among community members and chase them away.