Exploring the research in information technology implementation
Information and Management
A framework for identifying software project risks
Communications of the ACM
Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis
Information and Management
An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects
Journal of Systems and Software
Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study
Journal of Management Information Systems
An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management
Journal of Management Information Systems
Survey paper: A survey on the recent research literature on ERP systems
Computers in Industry - Special issue: Current trends in ERP implementations and utilisation
International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals
Towards a smart State? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration, and beyond
Information Polity - ICT, public administration and democracy in the coming decade
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents an empirical study of the risk factors of large governmental information systems IS projects. For this purpose the Official Decisions of the Greek Government Information Technology Projects Advisory Committee ITPAC concerning 80 large IS projects have been analyzed and interviews with its members have been conducted. From this analysis 21 risk factors have been identified, and further elaborated and associated with inherent particular characteristics of the public sector, extending existing approaches in the literature. A categorization of them with respect to origin revealed that they are associated with the management, the processes, and the content of these projects. Results show that behind the identified risk factors there are political factors, which are associated with intra-organizational and inter-organizational politics and competition, and can be regarded as 'second level' risk sources. The risk factors identified in this study are compared with the ones found by similar studies conducted in Hong Kong, Finland, and the United States, and also with the ones mentioned by OECD reports. Similarities and differences are discussed.