Feedback to renal transplant patients in a self-management support system

  • Authors:
  • Wenxin Wang;Willem-Paul Brinkman;Ton J. M. Rövekamp;Paul van der Boog;Laurence Alpay;Mark A. Neerincx

  • Affiliations:
  • Delft University of Technology, CD Delft, The Netherlands;Delft University of Technology, CD Delft, The Netherlands;TNO Lifestyle, Leiden, The Netherlands;Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands;TNO Lifestyle, Leiden, The Netherlands;Delft University of Technology, CD Delft, The Netherlands and TNO Human Factors, The Netherlands

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Motivation -- A key function of a future self-management support system (SMSS) for renal transplant patients is to provide feedback about their health status. This study investigates patients' understanding, preference, and trust of such feedback. Research approach -- Three types of feedback form, namely simplicity, empathy, and empowerment, were designed and tested with 12 non-patients. The task completeness and the participants' preference were compared. Findings -- The users did trust the empowerment feedback more than other feedback. Furthermore, the feedback types seemed to influence users' ability of reporting their previous days' health status. Research limitations/Implications -- This research worked out three feedback types and provided insight into their effectiveness and preference. However, the number of participants was small, and they were non-patients, highly educated and relatively young. Originality/Value -- This research investigated different feedback types for self-management support systems in the healthcare domain. Take away message -- The different way of presenting the same information might influence users' trust and understanding of their health status.