Is spoken text always better? Investigating the modality and redundancy effect with longer text presentation

  • Authors:
  • Anne SchüLer;Katharina Scheiter;Peter Gerjets

  • Affiliations:
  • Knowledge Media Research Center, Tuebingen, Germany;Knowledge Media Research Center, Tuebingen, Germany;Knowledge Media Research Center, Tuebingen, Germany

  • Venue:
  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • Year:
  • 2013

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The reported study investigated the influence of longer text presentation on the modality and the redundancy effect. In particular, the auditory-recency-effect explanation, which predicts that both effects should disappear when longer texts are presented, was tested against the text-processing explanation, which predicts that both effects should even reverse if text-processing strategies can be applied. In Experiment 1, a 2x2 between-subject design with animation presentation (yes vs. no) and text modality (written vs. spoken) was used (N=81). In line with the auditory-recency-effect explanation text modality did not influence learning outcomes. Moreover, animations facilitated transfer performance due to reduced cognitive effort. In Experiment 2, a 2x3 between-subject design with pacing (system-paced vs. learner-paced) and text modality (written vs. spoken vs. written and spoken) was used (N=122). Again, text modality did not influence learning outcomes regardless of whether the learning environment was learner- or system-paced, supporting the auditory-recency-effect explanation. The analysis of log-files, however, indicated that learners within the learner-paced condition with written text replayed the single text segments more often; moreover, replaying segments was positively correlated with learning outcomes. Thus, processing written text more intensively was associated with better learning outcomes, which supports the text-processing explanation.