Information foraging in information access environments
CHI '95 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution
CSCW '06 Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Give and take: a study of consumer photo-sharing culture and practice
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
ArtLinks: fostering social awareness and reflection in museums
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
What drives content tagging: the case of photos on Flickr
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge
Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web
Can all tags be used for search?
Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management
No bull, no spin: a comparison of tags with other forms of user metadata
Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
The impact of ambiguity and redundancy on tag recommendation in folksonomies
Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems
Why do people tag?: motivations for photo tagging
Communications of the ACM
Normative influences on thoughtful online participation
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Analyzing tag distributions in folksonomies for resource classification
KSEM'11 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Photo-tagging web sites provide several methods to annotate photographs. In this paper, we study how people use and respond to three different annotation styles: single-word tags, multi-word tags, and comments. We find significant differences in how annotation styles influence the objectivity, descriptiveness, and interestingness of annotations. Although single-word and multi-word tags are not normally differentiated, users prefer multi-word tags for their combination of descriptiveness and succinctness. We also discover that producers and consumers assess annotation styles differently in terms of ease of use, support for different user goals, and amount of effort required, demonstrating that allowing multiple modes of annotation is generally beneficial, as is considering both tag production and consumption.