Automatic prostate MR image segmentation with sparse label propagation and domain-specific manifold regularization

  • Authors:
  • Shu Liao;Yaozong Gao;Yinghuan Shi;Ambereen Yousuf;Ibrahim Karademir;Aytekin Oto;Dinggang Shen

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill;Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill;Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill;Department of Radiology, Section of Urology, University of Chicago;Department of Radiology, Section of Urology, University of Chicago;Department of Radiology, Section of Urology, University of Chicago;Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

  • Venue:
  • IPMI'13 Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging
  • Year:
  • 2013

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Automatic prostate segmentation in MR images plays an important role in prostate cancer diagnosis. However, there are two main challenges: (1) Large inter-subject prostate shape variations; (2) Inhomogeneous prostate appearance. To address these challenges, we propose a new hierarchical prostate MR segmentation method, with the main contributions lying in the following aspects: First, the most salient features are learnt from atlases based on a subclass discriminant analysis (SDA) method, which aims to find a discriminant feature subspace by simultaneously maximizing the inter-class distance and minimizing the intra-class variations. The projected features, instead of only voxel-wise intensity, will be served as anatomical signature of each voxel. Second, based on the projected features, a new multi-atlases sparse label fusion framework is proposed to estimate the prostate likelihood of each voxel in the target image from the coarse level. Third, a domain-specific semi-supervised manifold regularization method is proposed to incorporate the most reliable patient-specific information identified by the prostate likelihood map to refine the segmentation result from the fine level. Our method is evaluated on a T2 weighted prostate MR image dataset consisting of 66 patients and compared with two state-of-the-art segmentation methods. Experimental results show that our method consistently achieves the highest segmentation accuracies than other methods under comparison.