Inconsistency Handling in Multi-Perspective Specifications
ESEC '93 Proceedings of the 4th European Software Engineering Conference on Software Engineering
Instant consistency checking for the UML
Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering
HICSS '08 Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Detecting and Resolving Process Model Differences in the Absence of a Change Log
BPM '08 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Business Process Management
Managing Dependent Changes in Coupled Evolution
ICMT '09 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Model Transformations
COPE - Automating Coupled Evolution of Metamodels and Models
Genoa Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on ECOOP 2009 --- Object-Oriented Programming
The ICoP Framework: identification of correspondences between process models
CAiSE'10 Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Advanced information systems engineering
EDOC '10 Proceedings of the 2010 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference
Proceedings of the 38th annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages
From state- to delta-based bidirectional model transformations: the symmetric case
Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Model driven engineering languages and systems
ICSOC'06 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Service-oriented computing
Matching business process workflows across abstraction levels
MODELS'12 Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems
Updatable process views for user-centered adaption of large process models
ICSOC'12 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Service-Oriented Computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Different stakeholders in the Business Process Management (BPM) life cycle benefit from having different views onto a particular process model. Each view can show, and offer to change, the details relevant to the particular stakeholder, leaving out the irrelevant ones. However, introducing different views on a process model entails the problem to synchronize changes in case that one view evolves. This problem is especially relevant and challenging for views at different abstraction levels. In this paper, we propose a Shared Process Model that provides different stakeholder views at different abstraction levels and that synchronizes changes made to any view. We present detailed requirements and a solution design for the Shared Process Model in this paper. Moreover, we also present an overview of our prototypical implementation to demonstrate the feasibility of the approach.