Cognitive architectures and HCI

Authors:
Susan S. Kirschenbaum;Wayne D. Gray;Richard M. Young
Affiliations:
-;-;-
Venue:
ACM SIGCHI Bulletin
Year:
1996

Citing 8
Cited 2

Browser-Soar: a computational model of a highly interactive task

CHI '92 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
A computational model of skilled use of a graphical user interface

CHI '92 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
The cost-of-knowledge characteristic function: display evaluation for direct-walk dynamic information visualizations

CHI '94 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Why is a raven like a writing desk?: lessons in interface consistency and analogical reasoning from two cognitive architectures

CHI '94 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
A comprehension-based model of correct performance and errors in skilled, display-based, human-computer interaction

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Exploration and experienced performance with display-based systems

Exploration and experienced performance with display-based systems
The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction

The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction
Natural Training Wheels: Learning and Transfer Between Two Versions of a Computer Application

VCHCI '93 Proceedings of the Vienna Conference on Human Computer Interaction

Introduction to this special issue on cognitive architectures and human-computer interaction

Human-Computer Interaction
The role of cognitive architecture in modeling the user: Soar's learning mechanism

Human-Computer Interaction

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The Cognitive Architectures and Human-Computer Interaction Workshop examined computational cognitive modeling approaches to human-computer interaction issues (HCI). The five major architectures and variations represented were briefly summarized. Participants compared approaches to a set of selected HCI problems and alternative solutions, and compared the strengths and weaknesses of the architectures. A list of additional issues was generated and discussed.