Strategic directions in software quality
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) - Special ACM 50th-anniversary issue: strategic directions in computing research
A Taxonomy to Compare SPI Frameworks
EWSPT '01 Proceedings of the 8th European Workshop on Software Process Technology
Experimental validation of new software technology
Lecture notes on empirical software engineering
ICAIL '03 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Critical success factors for a customer relationship management strategy
Information and Software Technology
Complexity Measures for Secure Service-Oriented Software Architectures
PROMISE '07 Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Predictor Models in Software Engineering
An integrated infrastructure for monitoring and evaluating agent-based systems
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Software quality model based on software development approaches
SEA '07 Proceedings of the 11th IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications
Evaluating knowledge intensive multi-agent systems
AIS-ADM'07 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Autonomous intelligent systems: agents and data mining
Journal of Visual Languages and Computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In the previous article about the DESMET evaluation methodology, I identified nine different types of evaluation:1. Quantitative Experiments2. Quantitative Case Studies3. Quantitative Surveys4. Feature Analysis---Screening mode5. Feature Analysis---Case Study6. Feature Analysis---Experiment7. Feature Analysis---Survey8. Qualitative Effects Analysis9. Benchmarking.This article considers the way in which different evaluation requirements and organisation capabilities affect your choice of evaluation method. Your particular choice of evaluation method will be affected by your evaluation goals, the characteristics of the object you want to evaluate, the characteristics of the organisation you work in, and the limitations and constraints placed on the evaluation exercise. These different factors interact in complicated ways, so it is difficult to identify which evaluation method is the most appropriate.The specific criteria that the DESMET methodology uses to determine your circumstances are:1. The evaluation context.2. The nature of the expected impact of using the method/tool.3. The nature of the object (i.e., method/tool/generic method) to be evaluated.4. The scope of impact of the method/tool.5. The maturity of the method/tool.6. The learning curve associated with the method/tool.7. The measurement capability of the organisation undertaking the evaluation.These issues are discussed in the following sections.