Collaboration vs plagiarism in computer science programming courses

Authors:
Carolee Stewart-Gardiner;David G. Kay;Joyce Currie Little;Joseph D. Chase;John Fendrich;Laurie A. Williams;Ursula Wolz
Affiliations:
Kean University, Union, NJ;University of California, Irvine, CA;Towson University, Towson, MD;Radford University, Radford, VA;Illinois State University, Normal, IL;North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC;The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ
Venue:
Proceedings of the thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education
Year:
2001

Citing 0
Cited 3

Interactive program demonstration as a form of student program assessment

Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Experiences with pair programming at a small college

Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Understanding classroom culture through a theory of dialogism: what happens when cheating and collaboration collide?

CSCL'07 Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on Computer supported collaborative learning

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In some circles, all programming is collaborative, yet in many CS1 and CS2 courses, individual programming assignments are made, collaboration with other students is cheating, and tailoring a program found on the web is plagiarism. Many educators feel that collaboration belongs only in a very few upper division courses. Others have experience to show that early collaboration broadens the learning of students, to become more effective professional individuals. Most conclude that a blend of the two styles is best for students, and can reduce cheating/plagiarism.Does collaboration belong in programming classes? Where does collaboration end and cheating/plagiarism begin? What are the advantages, problems and techniques of allowing collaboration on programming assignments in CS1 and CS2? The moderator created six discussion questions. Each member of the panel has chosen the position they can strongly support from experience. This panel will discuss these questions in detail among the panelists and audience.