Invitation to a public debate on ethical computer use

  • Authors:
  • Sue Conger;Karen D. Loch

  • Affiliations:
  • Sewell Automotive Companies;Georgia State University

  • Venue:
  • ACM SIGMIS Database
  • Year:
  • 2000

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

To obtain ethically defensible behavior in a particular situation, or context, one must first define what is considered ethically defensible in that context. Without contextual norms, people assume no norms and are then (mis)guided solely by their own experience. According to Integrated Social Contracts Theory, typical contexts include individual-only situations and situations in which the individual is a member of professional, business and social organizations. Norm development is a complex process. It requires discussion between many individuals to identify the ethical issues relevant to each context, to define ethically defensible behaviors for each, and then to decide which norms take priority in the event of a conflict. This paper argues that the importance of context identifies fundamental flaws in the notion that professional associations can address all ethical behaviors through generic codes of ethics. The arguement goes further to assert that Integrated Social Contracts Theory, if applied to universal codes of ethics, can facilitate their redefinition into a useful set of guidelines for ethical professional behavior.