Computerized performance monitoring systems: use and abuse
Communications of the ACM
Computers in the human context: information technology, productivity, and people
Does electronic monitoring of employee internet usage work?
Communications of the ACM - Internet abuse in the workplace and Game engines in scientific research
Invitation to a public debate on ethical computer use
ACM SIGMIS Database
Situating workplace surveillance: Ethicsand computer based performance monitoring
Ethics and Information Technology
Information Systems Research
Trusting to learn: trust and privacy issues in serious games
TRUST'11 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Trust and trustworthy computing
Technostress: technological antecedents and implications
MIS Quarterly
DESRIST'12 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems: advances in theory and practice
The effects of sanctions and stigmas on cyberloafing
Computers in Human Behavior
Modifying smartphone user locking behavior
Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security
An investigation of the impact of abusive supervision on technology end-users
Computers in Human Behavior
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Computer-based monitoring, the practice of collecting performance information on employees through the computers they use at work, continues to be a popular topic. How much is known about computer-based monitoring as it is practiced in the workplace? Unfortunately, very little, even though much has been written on the subject. This article reports on five case studies of organizations that employ computer-based monitoring to collect performance data on clerical workers. Although all five organizations utilize similar data collection methods and procedures, no two organizations use the data collected in the same ways to evaluate employee performance. Each site reports different levels of employee satisfaction with minitoring, different abilities of employees to balance demands for work quantity and quality, different levels of work-related illnesses, and different perceptions of supervision. Although these results do not appear surprising on the surface, much of the popular literature on computer- based monitoring stresses the negative effects of monitoring on workers, no matter how or where it is implemented. In this study, the simple presence of computer-based monitoring was not enough to explain differences between sites. Rather, other factors, such as which data were used for evaluation and outside economic pressures, helped to explain variations in monitoring and its effects across sites. Computer-based monitoring, like other information technologies, is a malleable technology.