User perspectives on relevance criteria: a comparison among relevant, partially relevant , and not-relevant judgements

  • Authors:
  • Affiliations:
  • Venue:
  • Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
  • Year:
  • 2002

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this issue Maglaughin and Sonnenwald provided 12 graduate students with searches related to the student's work and asked them to judge the twenty most recent retrieved representations by highlighting passages thought to contribute to relevance, marking out passages detracting from relevance, and providing a relevant, partially relevant or relevant judgement on each. By recorded interview they were asked about how these decisions were made and to describe the three classes of judgement.