Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection
Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection
Coevolutionary search among adversaries
Coevolutionary search among adversaries
Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems
Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems
Incremental Co-Evolution of Organisms: A New Approach for Optimization and Discovery of Strategies
Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Advances in Artificial Life
Strongly Typed Genetic Programming in Evolving Cooperation Strategies
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms
Methods for Competitive Co-Evolution: Finding Opponents Worth Beating
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms
Co-evolving Soccer Softbot Team Coordination with Genetic Programming
RoboCup-97: Robot Soccer World Cup I
EuroGP '01 Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Genetic Programming
Design of Decentralized Controllers for Self-Reconfigurable Modular Robots Using Genetic Programming
EH '00 Proceedings of the 2nd NASA/DoD workshop on Evolvable Hardware
EH '01 Proceedings of the The 3rd NASA/DoD Workshop on Evolvable Hardware
Resource sharing and coevolution in evolving cellular automata
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
'Managed challenge' alleviates disengagement in co-evolutionary system identification
GECCO '05 Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
A Comprehensive Overview of the Applications of Artificial Life
Artificial Life
Coevolution in cartesian genetic programming
EuroGP'12 Proceedings of the 15th European conference on Genetic Programming
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We investigate two techniques for co-evolving and sampling from a population of fitness cases, and compare these with a random sampling technique. We design three symbolic regression problems on which to test these techniques, and also measure their relative performance on a modular robot control problem. The methods have varying relative performance, but in all of our experiments, at least one of the co-evolutionary methods outperforms the random sampling method by guiding evolution, with substantially fewer fitness evaluations, toward solutions that generalize best on an out-of-sample test set.