TCP and explicit congestion notification
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
Error Control and Energy Consumption in Communications for Nomadic Computing
IEEE Transactions on Computers - Special issue on mobile computing
Dummynet: a simple approach to the evaluation of network protocols
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
GloMoSim: a library for parallel simulation of large-scale wireless networks
PADS '98 Proceedings of the twelfth workshop on Parallel and distributed simulation
Analysis of TCP performance over mobile ad hoc networks
MobiCom '99 Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking
Adaptive link layer strategies for energy efficient wireless networking
Wireless Networks
Energy consumption of TCP Reno, Newreno, and SACK in multi-hop wireless networks
SIGMETRICS '02 Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
Energy/Throughput Tradeoffs of TCP Error Control Strategies
ISCC '00 Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC 2000)
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper we study the energy cost (protocol processing and communication cost) and goodput of two different flavors of TCP in ad hoc networks. We implemented a testbed and measured the actual energy cost as well as goodput of running TCP-SACK in ad hoc network scenarios. We also implemented Explicit Link Failure Notification (ELFN)[1] and Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN)[2] in Newreno and measured its performance. We see that the use of ECN & ELFN does yield higher goodput in most cases with a corresponding lower total energy cost. We see an energy savings of between 20% and 500% depending on the network conditions.