Congestion avoidance and control
SIGCOMM '88 Symposium proceedings on Communications architectures and protocols
The performance of TCP/IP for networks with high bandwidth-delay products and random loss
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
A comparison of mechanisms for improving TCP performance over wireless links
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
Comparative performance analysis of versions of TCP in a local network with a lossy link
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
Wave and Wait Protocol (WWP): An Energy-Saving Transport Protocol for Mobile IP-Devices
ICNP '99 Proceedings of the Seventh Annual International Conference on Network Protocols
A Survey of Energy Efficient Network Protocols for Wireless Networks
Wireless Networks
Energy consumption of TCP Reno, Newreno, and SACK in multi-hop wireless networks
SIGMETRICS '02 Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
The Wave & Probe Communication Mechanisms
The Journal of Supercomputing
Comparison of ECN-ELFN and SACK on TCP's performance for ad hoc networks
MSWiM '02 Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on Modeling analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems
Experimental Evaluation of TCP-Probing in Mobile Networks
The Journal of Supercomputing
Efficiency/Fairness Tradeoffs in Networks with Wireless Components and Transient Congestion
The Journal of Supercomputing
Performance of TCP on a Wideband CDMA Air Interface
IWDC '01 Proceedings of the Thyrrhenian International Workshop on Digital Communications: Evolutionary Trends of the Internet
Mobile Networks and Applications - Security in mobile computing environments
A receiver-centric transport protocol for mobile hosts with heterogeneous wireless interfaces
Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
Energy consumption of TCP in ad hoc networks
Wireless Networks
Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Wireless communications and mobile computing
A receiver-centric transport protocol for mobile hosts with heterogeneous wireless interfaces
Wireless Networks - Special issue: Selected papers from ACM MobiCom 2003
Exploiting energy-saving potential in heterogeneous networks
International Journal of Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems - Advances in Wireless Networks
Experimenting with τ-AIMD over wireless asynchronous networks
Computer Communications
Practical power modeling of data transmission over 802.11g for wireless applications
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Energy-Efficient Computing and Networking
Performance evaluation of τ-AIMD over wireless asynchronous networks
WWIC'05 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Wired/Wireless Internet Communications
Measuring transport protocol potential for energy efficiency
WWIC'05 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Wired/Wireless Internet Communications
Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Future energy systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Today's universal communications increasingly involve mobile and battery-powered devices (e.g. hand-held, laptop, IP-phone) over wired and wireless networks. Energy efficiency, as well as throughput, are becoming service characteristics of dominant importance in communication protocols. The wide applicability of IP-networks/devices, and the wide range of TCP-based applications, have rendered TCP the de facto reliable transport protocol standard not only for wired, but also for wireless and mixed (wired/wireless) communications. TCP's congestion control algorithms have recently been refined to achieve higher throughput. Even with these modifications, however, TCP versions do not incorporate a flexible error recovery strategy that is responsive to distinct environmental characteristics and device constraints. We have compared the energy- and throughput-efficiency of TCP error control strategies based on results gathered from our implementation of TCP Tahoe, Reno, and New Reno. We show that, depending on the frequency and duration of the error, each demonstrates appropriate behavior under specific circumstances, with Tahoe more-or-less the most energy conserving of the three. None of them, however, possesses a clear-cut overall advantage that would render it the version of choice for wired/wireless heterogeneous networks.