Games and full completeness for multiplicative linear logic
Journal of Symbolic Logic
The Pleadings Game: an exercise in computational dialectics
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Theories for mutagenicity: a study in first-order and feature-based induction
Artificial Intelligence - Special volume on empirical methods
The Zeno argumentation framework
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A shorter model theory
Automated argument assistance for lawyers
ICAIL '99 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person
Risk Agoras: Dialectical Argumentation for Scientific Reasoning
UAI '00 Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
Modeling Dialogues Using Argumentation
ICMAS '00 Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS-2000)
Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols
Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1
Games That Agents Play: A Formal Framework for Dialogues between Autonomous Agents
Journal of Logic, Language and Information
Chance discovery and scenario analysis
New Generation Computing - Special issue on chance discovery
A Dialogue Game Protocol for Agent Purchase Negotiations
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Optimal utterances in dialogue protocols
AAMAS '03 Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Hybrid argumentation systems for structured news reports
The Knowledge Engineering Review
What kind of argument are we going to have today?
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Liberalizing protocols for argumentation in multi-agent systems
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web
Artificial Intelligence
A generative inquiry dialogue system
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Using enthymemes in an inquiry dialogue system
Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 1
Can I Please Drop It? Dialogues About Belief Contraction
Agent Communication II
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
A Mathematical Model of Dialog
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS)
UAI'02 Proceedings of the Eighteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
New types of inter-agent dialogues
ArgMAS'05 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Liberalizing protocols for argumentation in multi-agent systems
ArgMAS'05 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
How agents alter their beliefs after an argumentation-based dialogue
ArgMAS'05 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
A dialogue game to offer an agreement to disagree
ProMAS'04 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Programming Multi-Agent Systems
Coherence constraints for agent interaction
AC'04 Proceedings of the 2004 international conference on Agent Communication
Locutions for argumentation in agent interaction protocols
AC'04 Proceedings of the 2004 international conference on Agent Communication
Research directions in agent communication
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) - Special section on agent communication, trust in multiagent systems, intelligent tutoring and coaching systems
Automata for infinite argumentation structures
Artificial Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We articulate a dialectical argumentation framework for qualitative representation of epistemic uncertainty in scientific domains. The framework is grounded in specific philosophies of science and theories of rational mutual discourse. We study the formal properties of our framework and provide it with a game theoretic semantics. With this semantics, we examine the relationship between the snaphots of the debate in the framework and the long run position of the debate, and prove a result directly analogous to the standard (Neyman–Pearson) approach to statistical hypothesis testing. We believe this formalism for representating uncertainty has value in domains with only limited knowledge, where experimental evidence is ambiguous or conflicting, or where agreement between different stakeholders on the quantification of uncertainty is difficult to achieve. All three of these conditions are found in assessments of carcinogenic risk for new chemicals.