A Case Study of Stochastic Optimization in Health Policy: Problem Formulation and Preliminary Results

  • Authors:
  • David Draper;Dimitris Fouskakis

  • Affiliations:
  • Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK (e-mail: d.draper@maths.bath.ac.uk, web http://www.bath.ac.uk/∼masdd;Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK (e-mail: df@maths.bath.ac.uk, web http://www.bath.ac.uk/∼mapdf

  • Venue:
  • Journal of Global Optimization
  • Year:
  • 2000

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We use Bayesian decision theory to address a variable selection problem arising in attempts to indirectly measure the quality of hospital care, by comparing observed mortality rates to expected values based on patient sickness at admission. Our method weighs data collection costs against predictive accuracy to find an optimal subset of the available admission sickness variables. The approach involves maximizing expected utility across possible subsets, using Monte Carlo methods based on random division of the available data into N modeling and validation splits to approximate the expectation. After exploring the geometry of the solution space, we compare a variety of stochastic optimization methods –- including genetic algorithms (GA), simulated annealing (SA), tabu search (TS), threshold acceptance (TA), and messy simulated annealing (MSA) –- on their performance in finding good subsets of variables, and we clarify the role of N in the optimization. Preliminary results indicate that TS is somewhat better than TA and SA in this problem, with MSA and GA well behind the other three methods. Sensitivity analysis reveals broad stability of our conclusions.