Survey of expert critiquing systems: practical and theoretical frontiers
Communications of the ACM
Diagnostic reasoning and planning in exploratory-corrective domains
Diagnostic reasoning and planning in exploratory-corrective domains
Critiquing: effective decision support in time-critical domains
Critiquing: effective decision support in time-critical domains
Expert Critiquing Systems
Plan Recognition and Evaluation for On-line Critiquing
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Critic Systems -- Towards Human--Computer Collaborative Problem Solving
Artificial Intelligence Review
ClassCompass: A software design mentoring system
Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC)
Quantifying adaptation parameters for information support of trauma teams
CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Transactive memory in trauma resuscitation
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Personalized emergency medical assistance for disabled people
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Teamwork Errors in Trauma Resuscitation
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Imagine a patient in shock and losing blood rapidly with a gunshot wound in the abdomen arriving at a hospital. A relatively inexperienced resident surgeon decides to do a CT (computerized tomography) scan of the abdomen to find the source of the bleeding and then take the patient to the operating room. The attending physician intervenes and recommends an abdominal X ray-an effective and faster procedure. She also suggests that the resident x-ray the chest to verify that the bullet did not travel upward and cause chest-cavity injuries. What enables an advisor to provide this kind of assistance? To evaluate and address misconceptions in a physicians plan, an advisor musthave a model of the physicians beliefs and goals, understand the problem and decide on the best solution, be able to explain her reasoning, and communicate in a way that will influence the physicians future actions.This article describes an approach for providing online decision support in complex, task-oriented situations. As the above example suggests, we have applied this approach to the management of multiple trauma-a task that typically involves reasoning about multiple goals, integrating diagnosis and treatment into a single management plan, efficiently allocating resources, and acting under time pressure. While this task can benefit from intelligent decision support, we also note that the tasks heavy cognitive demands and user reluctance to accept advice from computer systems inhibit such support. To minimize these obstacles, our interface provides concise, relevant, and user-focused critiques. This interface, TraumaTIQ, comprises a plan recognizer, a plan evaluator, and a language generator. (We present TraumaTIQs plan recognition and evaluation modules in detail elsewhere.1 ) In this article, we show how the three modules work together to produce the final critique.