Removing Node Overlapping in Graph Layout Using Constrained Optimization

  • Authors:
  • Kim Marriott;Peter Stuckey;Vincent Tam;Weiqing He

  • Affiliations:
  • School of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Australia marriott@cs.monash.edu.au;Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Australia pjs@cs.mu.oz.au;Department of Computer Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260, Singapore vtam@comp.nus.edu.sg;School of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Australia whe@cs.monash.edu.au

  • Venue:
  • Constraints
  • Year:
  • 2003

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Although graph drawing has been extensively studied, little attention has been paid to the problem of node overlapping. The problem arises because almost all existing graph layout algorithms assume that nodes are points. In practice, however, nodes may be labelled, and these labels may overlap. Here we investigate how such node overlapping can be removed in a subsequent layout adjustment phase. We propose four different approaches for removing node overlapping, all of which are based on constrained optimization techniques. The first is the simplest. It performs the minimal linear scaling which will remove node-overlapping. The second approach relies on formulating the node overlapping problem as a convex quadratic programming problem, which can then be solved by any quadratic solver. The disadvantage is that, since constraints must be linear, the node overlapping constraints cannot be expressed directly, but must be strengthened to obtain a linear constraint strong enough to ensure no node overlapping. The third and fourth approaches are based on local search methods. The third is an adaptation of the EGENET solver originally designed for solving general constraint satisfaction problems, while the fourth approach is a form of Lagrangian multiplier method, a well-known optimization technique used in operations research. Both the third and fourth method are able to handle the node overlapping constraints directly, and thus may potentially find better solutions. Their disadvantage is that no efficient global optimization methods are available for such problems, and hence we must accept a local minimum. We illustrate all of the above methods on a series of layout adjustment problems.