How to build a Beowulf: a guide to the implementation and application of PC clusters
How to build a Beowulf: a guide to the implementation and application of PC clusters
Genetic Programming III: Darwinian Invention & Problem Solving
Genetic Programming III: Darwinian Invention & Problem Solving
Automatic Creation of Human-Competitive Programs and Controllers by Means of Genetic Programming
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
Agent-based modelling of product invention
GECCO '05 Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Evolutionary Design of Arbitrarily Large Sorting Networks Using Development
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
Characterizing the dynamics of symmetry breaking in genetic programming
Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
From implementations to a general concept of evolvable machines
EuroGP'03 Proceedings of the 6th European conference on Genetic programming
Human-competitive results produced by genetic programming
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
Challenges of evolvable hardware: past, present and the path to a promising future
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Previous work has demonstrated that genetic programming can automatically create analog electrical circuits, controllers, and other devices that duplicate the functionality and, in some cases, partially or completely duplicate the exact structure of inventions that were patented between 1917 and 1962. This paper reports on a project in which we browsed patents of analog circuits issued after January 1, 2000 on the premise that recently issued patents represent current research that is considered to be of practical and scientific importance. The paper describes how we used genetic programming to automatically create circuits that duplicate the functionality or structure of five post-2000 patented inventions. This work employed four new techniques (motivated by the theory of genetic algorithms and genetic programming) that we believe increased the efficiency of the runs. When an automated method duplicates a previously patented human-designed invention, it can be argued that the automated method satisfies a Patent-Office-based variation of the Turing test.