Automatic assignment management and peer evaluation

Authors:
A. Trivedi;Dulal C. Kar;Holly Patterson-McNeill
Affiliations:
Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX;Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX;Division of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Lewis-Clark State College, Lewiston, ID
Venue:
Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Year:
2003

Citing 0
Cited 14

A learning and assessment tool for web-based distributed education

CITC4 '03 Proceedings of the 4th conference on Information technology curriculum
A web-based tool for managing the submission of student work

Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
A design for team peer code review

Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Peer assessment in the algorithms course

ITiCSE '05 Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
Lightweight preliminary peer review: does in-class peer review make sense?

Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Improving pedagogical feedback and objective grading

Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
An integrated web-based system for assignment creation, management, and peer evaluation

Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Integrating pedagogical code reviews into a CS 1 course: an empirical study

Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
Two peers are better than one: aggregating peer reviews for computing assignments is surprisingly accurate

Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work
The design of an online environment to support pedagogical code reviews

Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
Does studio-based instruction work in CS 1?: an empirical comparison with a traditional approach

Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
Online vs. face-to-face pedagogical code reviews: an empirical comparison

Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
Talking about code: Integrating pedagogical code reviews into early computing courses

ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) - Special Issue on Alternatives to Lecture in the Computer Science Classroom
Alternative assessment methods in technology enhanced project-based learning

International Journal of Learning Technology

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

Students in programming courses can learn from peer evaluation of their work. Also a student can learn by evaluating other students' works and can find many useful techniques in them to improve his/her programming skill. There are many tools available for online course management. However, none of them fully supports anonymous peer evaluation of assignments. In this work, we present a Web-based system that can be used to manage peer evaluation of assignments electronically and anonymously. The peer evaluation of an assignment is guided with a rubric designed and maintained by an instructor. The system has been developed by making use of free distribution of software products available for the public. Such a system can improve the quality of teaching in many computing courses, including all programming courses.