Third generation OO processes: a critique of RUP and OPEN from a project management perspective

Authors:
B. Henderson-Sellers;R. Due;I. Graham;G. Collins
Affiliations:
-;-;-;-
Venue:
APSEC '00 Proceedings of the Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference
Year:
2000

Citing 0
Cited 2

Identifying Extensions Required by RUP (Rational Unified Process) to Comply with CMM (Capability Maturity Model) Levels 2 and 3

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
The Introduction and Use of a Tailored Unified Process A Case Study

EUROMICRO '05 Proceedings of the 31st EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Second generation OO methods, with a few exceptions, contained no elements addressing process or project management. Third generation methods have been defined as those collaborative developments which also have a significant process element. Two examples are the rational unified process (RUP) and object-oriented process, environment and notation (OPEN). We examine RUP and OPEN from a project management viewpoint and evaluate whether either or both would meet acceptable standards in process support, project management guidelines and full lifecycle description for OO software development.