Communications of the ACM
Qualitative Methods in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Configurable development processes
Communications of the ACM - Robots: intelligence, versatility, adaptivity
The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, Second Edition
The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, Second Edition
Explaining Software Developer Acceptance of Methodologies: A Comparison of Five Theoretical Models
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Third generation OO processes: a critique of RUP and OPEN from a project management perspective
APSEC '00 Proceedings of the Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference
METRICS '04 Proceedings of the Software Metrics, 10th International Symposium
Tailoring RUP to a defined project type: a case study
PROFES'05 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement
A systematic review of software process tailoring
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
Using rational unified process in an SME – a case study
EuroSPI'05 Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Software Process Improvement
Tailoring and introduction of the rational unified process
EuroSPI'07 Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Software Process Improvement
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The Unified Process has become a widely known and used framework for software development organizations. The use of the framework, however, is not straight forward, and it has not been the intention from the creators of the framework that the development organization should use it ýout of the boxý. Some sort of tailoring or adoption is therefore necessary. This paper describes and investigates a case of tailoring, introducing and using RUP in a large software organization. The findings indicate that sufficient knowledge and motivation is an important factor of adopting a methodology.