Computer Database Organization, 2nd Ed
Computer Database Organization, 2nd Ed
The syntax of APL, an old approach revisited
APL '87 Proceedings of the international conference on APL: APL in transition
From a functional point of view: a framework for extensions to APL
APL '88 Proceedings of the international conference on APL
The A+ programming language, a different APL
APL '90 Conference proceedings on APL 90: for the future
APL as an embedded language: the ultimate application?
APL '91 Proceedings of the international conference on APL '91
The APL 90 project: new directions in APL interpreters technology
APL '85 Proceedings of the international conference on APL: APL and the future
Design: a financial modelling system
APL '85 Proceedings of the international conference on APL: APL and the future
A proposal for control structures in APL
APL '84 Proceedings of the international conference on APL
The future of programming—whither APL?
APL '84 Proceedings of the international conference on APL
APL '83 Proceedings of the international conference on APL
Extending APL: What more can a programmer ask for?
APL '82 Proceedings of the international conference on APL
A self-defining dynamic data management system using multiple access methods
APL '82 Proceedings of the international conference on APL
APL '82 Proceedings of the international conference on APL
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The evolution of computer languages is compared with the evolution of natural languages. This suggests that APL might one day evolve to, or be replaced by, a non-declining form having only one basic syntax and only one class of object—as LISP has today. These “generalized objects” would embrace files, functions, and workspaces as we now know them. Such objects might be nested arrays with extended indexing and added features for sharing and access control.