Types, distribution, and test and correction times for programming errors

  • Authors:

  • M. L. Shooman;M. I. Bolsky

  • Affiliations:

  • Polytechnic Institute of New York and Consultant to Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated;Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the international conference on Reliable software
  • Year:
  • 1975

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In order to develop some basic information on software errors, an experiment in collecting data on types and frequencies of such errors was conducted at Bell Laboratories. The paper reports the results of this experiment, whose objectives were to: (1) Develop and utilize a set of terms for describing possible types of errors, their nature, and their frequency; (2) Perform a pilot study to determine if data of the type reported in this paper could be collected; (3) Investigate the error density and its correspondence to predictions from previous data reported; (4) Develop data on how resources are expended in debugging. A program of approximately 4K machine instructions (final size) was chosen. Programmers were asked to fill out for each error, in addition to the regular Trouble Report/Correction Report (TR/CR) form, a special Supplementary TR/CR form for the purposes of this experiment. Sixty-three TR/CR and Supplementary forms were completed during the Test and Integration phase of the program. In general, the data collected were felt to be accurate enough for the purposes of the analyses presented. The 63 forms represented a little over 1-1/2% of the total number of machine instructions of the program. (In good agreement with the 1% to 2% range noted in previous studies.) It was discovered that a large percentage of the errors was found by hand processing (without the aid of a computer). This method was found to be much cheaper than techniques involving machine testing.